Predictive analytics applied to Alzheimer’s disease : a data visualisation framework for understanding current research and future challenges

Dissertation as a partial requirement for obtaining a master’s degree in information management, with a specialisation in Business Intelligence and Knowledge Management.Big Data is, nowadays, regarded as a tool for improving the healthcare sector in many areas, such as in its economic side, by trying to search for operational efficiency gaps, and in personalised treatment, by selecting the best drug for the patient, for instance. Data science can play a key role in identifying diseases in an early stage, or even when there are no signs of it, track its progress, quickly identify the efficacy of treatments and suggest alternative ones. Therefore, the prevention side of healthcare can be enhanced with the usage of state-of-the-art predictive big data analytics and machine learning methods, integrating the available, complex, heterogeneous, yet sparse, data from multiple sources, towards a better disease and pathology patterns identification. It can be applied for the diagnostic challenging neurodegenerative disorders; the identification of the patterns that trigger those disorders can make possible to identify more risk factors, biomarkers, in every human being. With that, we can improve the effectiveness of the medical interventions, helping people to stay healthy and active for a longer period. In this work, a review of the state of science about predictive big data analytics is done, concerning its application to Alzheimer’s Disease early diagnosis. It is done by searching and summarising the scientific articles published in respectable online sources, putting together all the information that is spread out in the world wide web, with the goal of enhancing knowledge management and collaboration practices about the topic. Furthermore, an interactive data visualisation tool to better manage and identify the scientific articles is develop, delivering, in this way, a holistic visual overview of the developments done in the important field of Alzheimer’s Disease diagnosis.Big Data é hoje considerada uma ferramenta para melhorar o sector da saúde em muitas áreas, tais como na sua vertente mais económica, tentando encontrar lacunas de eficiência operacional, e no tratamento personalizado, selecionando o melhor medicamento para o paciente, por exemplo. A ciência de dados pode desempenhar um papel fundamental na identificação de doenças em um estágio inicial, ou mesmo quando não há sinais dela, acompanhar o seu progresso, identificar rapidamente a eficácia dos tratamentos indicados ao paciente e sugerir alternativas. Portanto, o lado preventivo dos cuidados de saúde pode ser bastante melhorado com o uso de métodos avançados de análise preditiva com big data e de machine learning, integrando os dados disponíveis, geralmente complexos, heterogéneos e esparsos provenientes de múltiplas fontes, para uma melhor identificação de padrões patológicos e da doença. Estes métodos podem ser aplicados nas doenças neurodegenerativas que ainda são um grande desafio no seu diagnóstico; a identificação dos padrões que desencadeiam esses distúrbios pode possibilitar a identificação de mais fatores de risco, biomarcadores, em todo e qualquer ser humano. Com isso, podemos melhorar a eficácia das intervenções médicas, ajudando as pessoas a permanecerem saudáveis e ativas por um período mais longo. Neste trabalho, é feita uma revisão do estado da arte sobre a análise preditiva com big data, no que diz respeito à sua aplicação ao diagnóstico precoce da Doença de Alzheimer. Isto foi realizado através da pesquisa exaustiva e resumo de um grande número de artigos científicos publicados em fontes online de referência na área, reunindo a informação que está amplamente espalhada na world wide web, com o objetivo de aprimorar a gestão do conhecimento e as práticas de colaboração sobre o tema. Além disso, uma ferramenta interativa de visualização de dados para melhor gerir e identificar os artigos científicos foi desenvolvida, fornecendo, desta forma, uma visão holística dos avanços científico feitos no importante campo do diagnóstico da Doença de Alzheimer

Sea turtles : University of Florida – University of the Azores connection 1984 – present. A review

The loggerhead (Caretta caretta) is the most common sea turtle in the Azores. Since they do not nest in the area, a tagging program was started in the 1980’s to try to discover their origin. The result based on size distribution, suggested that they mainly are coming from beaches in SE United States. A collaboration between University of Florida and the University of the Azores began in 1984 in order to proceed with further research.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Design and baseline characteristics of the finerenone in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in diabetic kidney disease trial

Background: Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials. Patients and Methods: The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >= 30 to <= 5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level alpha = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone

As part of an EU funded project to investigate the factors influencing bone preservation in the archaeological record, more than 250 bones from 41 archaeological sites in five countries spanning four climatic regions were studied for diagenetic alteration. Sites were selected to cover a range of environmental conditions and archaeological contexts. Microscopic and physical (mercury intrusion porosimetry) analyses of these bones revealed that the majority (68%) had suffered microbial attack. Furthermore, significant differences were found between animal and human bone in both the state of preservation and the type of microbial attack present. These differences in preservation might result from differences in early taphonomy of the bones. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine

Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

Background The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. Results A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). Conclusion Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries

This was an investigator initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by RP. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London